Navigate the 1563 Edition
PrefaceBook 1Book 2Book 3Book 4Book 5
Thematic Divisions in Book 5
1. Preface to Rubric 2. The Rubric 3. Mary's First Moves 4. The Inhibition5. Bourne's Sermon 6. The True Report7. The Precept to Bonner 8. Anno 15549. From 'The Communication' to 'A Monition' 10. Bonner's Monition11. Mary's Articles for Bonner 12. The Articles 13. From Mary's Proclamation to the 'Stile'14. From the 'Stile' to the 'Communication' 15. The 'Communication' 16. How Thomas Cranmer ... 17. Cranmer18. Ridley 19. Latimer20. Harpsfield's Forme 21. 1563's Disputational Digest22. Political Events up to Suffolk's Death 23. Between Mantell and the Preacher's Declaration 24. The Declaration of Bradford et al 25. May 19 to August 1 26. August 1 - September 3 27. From Bonner's Mandate to Pole's Oration 28. Winchester's Sermon to Bonner's Visitation 29. Pole's Oration 30. From the Supplication to Gardiner's Sermon 31. From Gardiner's Sermon to 1555 32. From the Arrest of Rose to Hooper's Letter 33. Hooper's Answer and Letter 34. To the End of Book X 35. The Martyrdom of Rogers 36. The Martyrdom of Saunders 37. Saunders' Letters 38. Hooper's Martyrdom 39. Hooper's Letters 40. Rowland Taylor's Martyrdom 41. Becket's Image and other events 42. Miles Coverdale and the Denmark Letters 43. Bonner and Reconciliation 44. Robert Farrar's Martyrdom 45. The Martyrdom of Thomas Tomkins 46. The Martyrdom of Rawlins/Rowland White47. The Martyrdom of Higbed and Causton 48. The Martyrdom of William Hunter 49. The Martyrdom of Pigot, Knight and Laurence 50. Judge Hales 51. The Providential Death of the Parson of Arundel 52. The Martyrdom of John Awcocke 53. The Martyrdom of George Marsh 54. The Letters of George Marsh 55. The Martyrdom of William Flower 56. Mary's False Pregnancy57. The Martyrdom of Cardmaker and Warne 58. John Tooly 59. The Examination of Robert Bromley [nb This is part of the Tooly affair]60. Censorship Proclamation 61. The Martyrdom of Thomas Haukes 62. Letters of Haukes 63. The Martyrdom of Thomas Watts 64. Martyrdom of Osmund, Bamford, Osborne and Chamberlain65. The Martyrdom of Ardley and Simpson 66. The Martyrdom of John Bradford 67. Bradford's Letters 68. William Minge 69. The Martyrdom of John Bland 70. The Martyrdom of Frankesh, Middleton and Sheterden 71. Sheterden's Letters 72. Martyrdom of Carver and Launder 73. Martyrdom of Thomas Iveson 74. John Aleworth 75. Martyrdom of James Abbes 76. Martyrdom of Denley, Newman and Pacingham 77. Examinations of Hall, Wade and Polley 78. Richard Hooke 79. Martyrdom of William Coker, et al 80. Martyrdom of George Tankerfield, et al 81. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Smith 82. Martyrdom of Harwood and Fust 83. Martyrdom of William Haile 84. Examination of John Newman 85. Martyrdom of Robert Samuel 86. George King, Thomas Leyes and John Wade 87. William Andrew 88. William Allen 89. Martyrdom of Thomas Cobb 90. Martyrdom of Roger Coo 91. Martyrdom of Catmer, Streater, Burwood, Brodbridge, Tutty 92. Martyrdom of Hayward and Goreway 93. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Glover 94. John and William Glover 95. Cornelius Bungey 96. Martyrdom of Wolsey and Pigot 97. Life and Character of Nicholas Ridley 98. Ridley and Latimer's Conference 99. Ridley's Letters 100. Life of Hugh Latimer 101. Latimer's Letters 102. Ridley and Latimer Re-examined and Executed103. More Letters of Ridley 104. Life and Death of Stephen Gardiner 105. Martyrdom of Webb, Roper and Park 106. William Wiseman 107. Examinations and Martyrdom of John Philpot 108. John Went 109. Isobel Foster 110. Joan Lashford 111. Five Canterbury Martyrs 112. Life and Martyrdom of Cranmer 113. Letters of Cranmer 114. Martyrdom of Agnes Potten and Joan Trunchfield 115. Persecution in Salisbury Maundrell, Coberly and Spicer 116. William Tyms, et al 117. The Norfolk Supplication 118. Letters of Tyms 119. John Hullier's Execution120. John Hullier 121. Christopher Lister and five other martyrs 122. Hugh Lauerocke and John Apprice 123. Katherine Hut, Elizabeth Thacknell, et al 124. Martyrdom of John Harpole and Joan Beach 125. Thomas Drury and Thomas Croker 126. Thomas Spicer, John Deny and Edmund Poole 127. Thomas Rede128. Persecution of Winson and Mendlesam 129. William Slech 130. Avington Read, et al 131. Wood and Miles 132. Adherall and Clement 133. A Merchant's Servant Executed at Leicester 134. Thirteen Burnt at Stratford-le-Bow135. Persecution in Lichfield 136. Hunt, Norrice, Parret 137. Martyrdom of Bernard, Lawson and Foster 138. John Careless 139. Letters of John Careless 140. Martyrdom of Julius Palmer 141. Guernsey Martyrdoms 142. Dungate, Foreman and Tree 143. Martyrdom of Joan Waste 144. Three Men of Bristol145. Martyrdom of Edward Sharpe 146. Four Burnt at Mayfield at Sussex 147. John Horne and a woman 148. Northampton Shoemaker 149. Prisoners Starved at Canterbury 150. More Persecution at Lichfield 151. Exhumations of Bucer and Phagius along with Peter Martyr's Wife152. Pole's Visitation Articles for Kent153. Ten Martyrs Burnt at Canterbury154. The 'Bloody Commission'155. Twenty-two Prisoners from Colchester156. Five Burnt at Smithfield157. Stephen Gratwick and others158. Edmund Allen and other martyrs159. Edmund Allen160. Alice Benden and other martyrs161. Richard Woodman and nine other martyrs162. Ambrose163. The Martyrdom of Simon Miller and Elizabeth Cooper164. Rose Allin and nine other Colchester Martyrs165. John Thurston166. Thomas More167. George Eagles168. Richard Crashfield169. Fryer and George Eagles' sister170. John Kurde171. Cicelye Ormes172. Joyce Lewes173. Rafe Allerton and others174. Agnes Bongeor and Margaret Thurston175. Persecution at Lichfield176. Persecution at Chichester177. Thomas Spurdance178. Hallingdale, Sparrow and Gibson179. John Rough and Margaret Mearing180. Cuthbert Simson181. William Nicholl182. Seaman, Carman and Hudson183. Three at Colchester184. A Royal Proclamation185. Roger Holland and other Islington martyrs186. Richard Yeoman187. John Alcocke188. Alcocke's Epistles189. Thomas Benbridge190. Stephen Cotton and other martyrs191. Alexander Gouch and Alice Driver192. Three at Bury193. The Final Five Martyrs194. William Living195. The King's Brief196. William Browne197. Some Persecuted at Suffolk198. Elizabeth Lawson199. Edward Grew200. The Persecuted of Norfolk201. The Persecuted of Essex202. Thomas Bryce203. The Persecuted in Kent204. The Persecuted in Coventry and the Exiles205. Thomas Parkinson206. The Scourged: Introduction207. Richard Wilmot and Thomas Fairfax208. Thomas Greene209. Bartlett Greene and Cotton210. Steven Cotton's Letter211. Scourging of John Milles212. Scourging of Thomas Hinshaw213. Robert Williams214. Bonner's Beating of Boys215. A Beggar of Salisbury216. John Fetty217. James Harris218. Providences: Introduction219. The Miraculously Preserved220. Christenmas and Wattes221. Simon Grinaeus222. John Glover223. Dabney224. Alexander Wimshurst225. Bosom's wife226. The Delivery of Moyse227. Lady Knevet228. Crosman's wife229. Congregation at Stoke in Suffolk230. Congregation of London231. Robert Cole232. Englishmen at Calais233. John Hunt and Richard White234. Punishments of Persecutors235. Tome 6 Life and Preservation of the Lady Elizabeth236. The Westminster Conference237. Nicholas Burton238. Another Martyrdom in Spain239. Baker and Burgate240. Burges and Hoker241. Justice Nine-Holes242. Back to the Appendix notes243. A Poor Woman of Exeter244. Those Burnt at Bristol: extra material245. Priest's Wife of Exeter246. Gertrude Crockhey
Critical Apparatus for this Page
None
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
975 [97]

might be resolued of their argumēts in þe which they stode, as it shal appeare vnto you, not doutyng but they wyll also condiscende vnto vs. Than he demaunded of maister Haddon whether he would reason against the questions proposed or no? To whom MarginaliaM. Haddon. he made aunswere that he had certifyed hym before by writyng that he would not, since the request of such learned mē as were demaunded to be assistent with them, would not be granted. Maister Elmar likewise was asked: MarginaliaM. Elmar who made the Prolocutor the lyke aunswere, adding moreouer this, that they had done to muche preiudice already to the truthe, to subscribe before the matter was discussed: & litle or nothing it might auaile to reason for the truthe, since al they wer now determined to the contrarye. After this he demaunded of mayster Cheny, whom the Prolocutor said allowed the presence with them, but he denied the transubstanciation, by the meanes of certaine autorities, vppon the which he standeth and , desyreth to be resolued, as you shall heare whether he wyll propose his doutes concernyng transubstanciation or no. MarginaliaM. Chenyes obiections. Yea, quoth he, I would gladly my doutes to bee resolued whiche moue me not to beleue transubstanciation. The fyrste is out of the scripture of saint Paule to the Corinthians who speaking of the sacrament of the body and bloud of Christ calleth it oft tymes bred, after the consecration. The second is out of Origene, who speakyng of this sacrament sayeth that the material part therof goeth down to the excrementes. The third is out of Theodoretus who makyng mention of the sacramental bread and wyne after the consecration sayth that they go not out of theyr former substance, forme and shape. These be some of my doutes among many other, whiche I require to be aunswered of. Than the Prolocutor assigned D. Moreman to aunswer him. MarginaliaMoremās answere to S. Paule. Who to saint Paul answered him thus, that the sacrament is called bread by hym in dede, but it is thus to be vnderstande that it is bread of the sacramentall bread, that is, the forme of bread. MarginaliaMaister Chenies replicatiō Than maister Cheny, inferred and alledged that Hisychius called the sacramēt both bread and fleshe. Yea, quoth Moremā Hisychius calleth it bread, because it was bred and not because it is so. And passyng ouer Origen, he came to Theodoretus, and sayd that mē mistoke his authoritie, by interpreting a general in to a speciall, as Peter Martir hath done in that place of Theodoret, interpreting ουσία, for substāce, which is a special significatiō of the word. Whereas ουσία is a generall word as wel to accidence as to substance. MarginaliaMoremās aunswer to Theodoret Mark this answer and shyft. And therfore I answere thus vnto Theodoret that the sacramental bred and wine do not go out of theyr former substāce forme and shape, that is to say, not out of theyr accidentall substance and shape. After this maister Cheny satte hym down: and by and by MarginaliaM. Elmar maister Elmar stoode vp, as one that coulde not abyde to heare so fonde an aunswere to so graue an authoritie. And reasoned vpon the authority of Theodoret, alledged before by maister Chenye, and declared that Moremans aunswere to Theodoret was no iuste nor sufficiente aunswere, but an illusyon and a subtyle euasyon contrarye to Theodoretes meanynge. For sayde hee, yf (ουσία) shoulde signyfye an accydence in the place alledged, as it is aunswered by master Moreman, than were it a word superfluous sette in Theodorete, there where

[Back to Top]

do folow. ii. other wordes which sufficyently do expounde the accidents of the bread, that is, εἶδος και σχῆμα, which signify in English, shape and forme: MarginaliaMoremans shifft is ouerthrowen. And so very lernedly proued oute of the same author by dyuers allegacyons that (ουσία) in greke could not be so generally takē in that place as Moremā for a shifft wold haue it. But Moreman as a man hauing no nother salue for that sore, affyrmed styll that (ουσιαν) which signyfyeth substance, must nedes signify an accidētal substance properly. To whose importunyte syns he could haue no nother answer, Elmar as a mā weryed wyth so long talk gaue place. MarginaliaFylpots replicacyon, to Moremans shyfte. After this, stode vp Iohn Fylpot, and sayd that he could proue that by the matter that Theodoret intreateth of in the place aboue alleaged, & by the simylitude which he makyth to proue hys purpose, by no meanes maister Moremans interpretacyon of (ουσια), might be taken for accydentall substance as he for a shift wold interpret it to be. For the matter whych Theodoret intreatyth of in that place is agaīst Eutyches an heretike, which denied ii. natures of substance to remayne in Christ beyng one parson, but that hys humanyty after thaccomplyshment of the mystery of our saluacion ascēdyng into heauen and beyng ioyned vnto the dyuynitie, was absorpt or swalowed vp of the same, so that christ shuld be no more but of one diuyne substance only by hys opinion. Agaynst whych opinion Theodoret writeth, and by the symilitude of the sacrament proueth the contrary against the heretike: that like as in the sacrament of the body of christ after the consecraciō. there is the substāce of christes humanyty with the substance of brad, remayning as it was before, not being absorpt of the humanity of christ but ioined by the diuine operation therunto. Euen so in the parson of christ being nowe in heauen, of whome this sacrament is a representacion, there be ii. seuerall substances, that is, his diuinitie and humanitye vnited in one hipostasy or parson, which is christ. The humanitie not absorpt by the coniunctyon of the deitie but remaining in his former substance. And this similitude, quod Filpot, brought in of Theodorete to confounde Eutyches, should proue nothing at all, yf the very substance of the sacramentall bread dyd not remain, as it did before: but if Doctor Moremans interpretatiō might take place for transubstanciacion, than shoulde the heretike haue thereby a strong argument by Theodoretes authoritye so taken to mayntein his heresy and to proue hym selfe a good christē man, and he might well saye thus vnto Theodoret: Like as thou Theodoret if thou were of Doctor Moremans mynde, doest say that after the consecration in the sacrament the substance of the bread is absorpte or transsubstancyate in to the humane body of Christ comming therunto, so that in the sacrament is now but one substance of the humanitie a lone, and not the substance of bread as it was before, euen likewyse may I affyrme and conclude by thyne owne similytude that the humanitye ascending vp by the powre of god into heauen & adioyned vnto the deitye was by the myght therof absorpt and turned into one substance with the deity: so that nowe there remayneth but one diuine substaunce in Christ, nomore than in the sacramētall signes of the lordes supper after the consecration do remayne anye more than one sub-

[Back to Top]

stance

MMm.iiii.

Go To Modern Page No:  
Click on this link to switch between the Modern pagination for this edition and Foxe's original pagination when searching for a page number. Note that the pagination displayed in the transcription is the modern pagination with Foxe's original pagination in square brackets.
Find:
Type a keyword and then restrict it to a particular edition using the dropdown menu. You can search for single words or phrases. When searching for single words, the search engine automatically imposes a wildcard at the end of the keyword in order to retrieve both whole and part words. For example, a search for "queen" will retrieve "queen", "queene" and "queenes" etc.
in:  
Humanities Research Institute  *  HRI Online  *  Feedback
Version 2.0 © 2011 The University of Sheffield