lique church. Then the byshop, beyng in great displeasure with me, because I made doubtes in my writing, cōmaunded me to pryson, wher I was a whyle. But afterwardes by the meanes of frendes, I came out againe. Here is the truth of that matter. And as concernynge the thyng that ye couet moste to knowe, resorte to the vi. of Iohn, and be ruled alwayes therby. Thus fare ye well. Quod Anne Askewe.
[Back to Top]J Anne Askewe, of good memory, although my mercifull father hath geuē me the bread of aduersytie, and the water of trouble: yet not so muche as my synnes haue deserued: confesse my selfe here a synner before the throne of hys heauenly maiestie, desyryng his forgeuenes & mercy. And for so muche as I am by the lawe vnrightuously condēpned for an euyl doer, cōcerning opinions, I take the same moste mercifull God of myne, whiche hathe made bothe heauen and earth, to recorde, that I holde no opynions contrarie to his mooste holye worde. And I trust in my mercyfull Lorde, whiche is the geuer of all grace, that he wyll graciously assiste me against all euyll opinions, whiche are contrary to his blessed veritie. For I take hym to wytnesse, that I haue done and wyll doo vnto my lyues ende, vtterly abhorre them, to the vttermoste of my power. But this is the heresye whiche they reporte me to holde, MarginaliaThe matter and cause why Anne Askew suffered death.that after the priest hath spoken the wordes of consecration, there remayneth bread styll.
[Back to Top]But they both saye, and also teache it for a necessarye artycle of faythe, that after those wordes be once spoken, there remayneth noo bread, but euen the selfe same body, that hong vpō the crosse on good fryday, both flesh, bloud and bone. To this belefe of theirs saye I naye: For then were our cōmon Crede false, which sayeth that he sytteth on the ryghte hande of God the father almyghtie: And from thence shall come to iudge the quicke and dead
This is a reference to the Apostles' Creed.
By me Anne Askewe.
HEtherto we haue intreated of this good womā, now it remaineth þt we touch somwhat as touhing her end & martyrdom
Foxe again adds to the information provided by his base text in providing details of Askew's execution. In the 1563 edition (681-82) he describes Askew's crippled state which made it necessary to bring her to the stake in a chair, and portrays her both 'stoutly' resisting Shaxton's attempt to 'make her turn' in the sermon of recantation that he gave at her execution, and refusing even to look at the royal pardon offered to her on condition of her own recantation. Foxe adds to these details in the 1570 edition; it is here that the reader learns the names of those notables in attendance and of Askew's interjections into Shaxton's sermon ('where he sayde well, confirmed the same: where he sayd amysse, there sayd she, he misseth, and speaketh without the book' (1570, p. 1420). It is also in this edition that the reader learns of Askew's response to the offer of a royal pardon - that 'shee came not thither to deny her Lord and Mayster' - and that, as she was offered her pardon first, the men burnt with her followed 'the constancie of the woman' in refusing theirs. Like Askew in the 1563 edition, they 'denyed not onely to receive them, but also to looke upon them'.
[Back to Top]Foxe's source for this additional information remains uncertain, but it is likely that this material came from eyewitnesses to her death, and Freeman and Wall suggest, as a source, Francis Russell, the second Earl of Bedford. As they note, Russell had provided Foxe with other information and documents for the 1570 edition of the Acts and Monuments, and John Russell, his father, was seated at the execution with Wriothelsey and other notables. It is possible that Francis, a young man at the time, was with his father at the execution. (See Thomas F. Freeman and Sarah E. Wall, 'Racking the Body, Shaping the Text: The Account of Anne Askew in Foxe's Book of Martyrs', Renaissance Quarterly 54 [2001], 1185).
[Back to Top]